AI vs Random
Benchmark Results
We ran a empirical backtest simulation using historical data to verify if our LLM (AI) models could statistically outperform pure random selection with special prompt and statistical analysis.
(Updated Jan 24, 2026)
*Calculated based on 1,350 comparisons in a simulated environment. Results may vary in future draws; this is not a guarantee of success.
Model Performance Leaderboard
Comparing top Gemini Models against random baseline
| Rank | Model Name | Total Score | Efficiency | Attempts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Gemini 2.5 Flash Jackpot Hunter | 6,030 pts | 502.5 pts/gen | 12 |
2 | Gemini 3 Flash (Preview) New Entrant | 5,160 pts | 198.5 pts/gen | 26 |
3 | Gemini 2.5 Pro Highest Efficiency | 5,110 pts | 212.9 pts/gen | 24 |
4 | Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite Most Reliable | 1,380 pts | 23.8 pts/gen | 58 |
5 | Others (Mixed) Claude 3.5, GPT-5 Nano, etc. | 1,150 pts | 76.7 pts/gen | 15 |
Powerball Real-World Simulation
Methodology: To ensure statistical rigor, we conducted a massive backtest simulation. We took 135 unique AI-generated sets and cross-referenced each one against the latest 10 official Powerball draws (2025.12.29 - 2026.01.19). This created 1,350 distinct data points, which we then compared against an equal number of random sets to isolate the AI's predictive edge.
| Matching Results | Theoretical | Random (1,350) | AI Model (1,350) | The Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 Numbers (Total Loss) | 67.84% | 68.76% | 50.74% | -18.02% Loss |
| 1 Number Matched | 28.27% | 27.23% | 38.67% | +11.44% Acc |
| 2 Numbers Matched | 3.71% | 3.92% | 9.56% | 2.44x Better |
| 3 Numbers Matched | 0.18% | 0.077% | 0.96% | 12.5x Dominance |
| 4 Numbers Matched | 0.002% | 0.00% | 0.07% | AI Exclusive |
Probability Density
Matching 4 numbers in Powerball mathematically requires 36,525 tickets on average.
Our AI achieved this result in just 135 generations. This suggests a potential Search Space Optimization. It implies that the AI model may be identifying favorable patterns more frequently than random chance, potentially increasing the 'density' of winning numbers within a smaller sample size.
Target hit 27x faster
Transparent Insight: The Bonus Ball Gap
While our AI excels at Main Number Combinations (beating random by 2.5x), the Powerball (Bonus) prediction remains as volatile as random selection. We believe in showing the raw truth of data.
Hall of Fame
Backtest Results4 Numbers Matched
Draw Date: 2025.12.29 (Gemini 2.5 Flash)
Common Questions
Understanding the data and limitations
